Home Blog Page 50

ICHRP Statement on the Passing of Jose Maria Sison

0

Statement

December 23, 2022

The International Coalition for Human Rights in the Philippines (ICHRP) joins the international community in grieving the sudden and unexpected passing of Jose Maria “Ka Joma” Sison. He died at the age of 83 last December 16 after being confined for two weeks in a hospital in Utrecht, The Netherlands.

He was the founding Chairperson of the Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP), the Chief Political Consultant of the National Democratic Front of the Philippines (NDFP) Peace Negotiating Panel, and Emeritus Chair of the International League of People’s Struggle (ILPS), which he also helped found in 2001.

“Sison was a patriot and a staunch fighter for the comprehensive individual and collective human rights of the Filipino people for over 60 years,” said ICHRP chairperson Peter Murphy. 

“His advocacy of armed struggle as a legitimate and vital part of the Filipino liberation struggle attracted massive retaliation from the US government and its Filipino subordinates. But all peoples have the right to rebel against tyranny, as expressed in the preamble to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Ka Joma insisted that the armed struggle in the Philippines be conducted lawfully,” said Murphy.

While in exile in the Netherlands, Sison was able to play a key role in the decades-long peace talks between the Government of the Republic of the Philippines and the National Democratic Front of the Philippines. Through his active participation with the NDFP panel, three major agreements between the two parties were signed — the Hague Joint Declaration, the Comprehensive Agreement on Respect for Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law (CARHRIHL), and the Joint Agreement on Security and Immunity Guarantees (JASIG). As well, Ka Joma contributed to the draft Comprehensive Agreement on Social and Economic Reforms (CASER), which was initiated by both negotiating panels in 2017, but blocked by President Duterte.

“The draft CASER represents a decisive step forward in addressing the roots of social conflict in the Philippines,” said Murphy.

These agreements are monumental contributions to the struggle for the Filipino people’s rights. The Hague Joint Declaration recognized that the NDFP and GRP are equals in the peace talks, which are aimed at resolving the armed conflict with a just and lasting peace. It set out four substantive agenda for the negotiations — CARHRIHL, social and economic reforms, political and constitutional reforms, and the end of hostilities and disposition of forces. 

CARHRIHL applies the United Nations international human rights conventions and International Humanitarian Law to ensure the protection and respect of the human rights of civilians and of forces of both parties who are rendered hors de combat while directly participating in the armed conflict. The draft CASER contains specific initiatives to solve the poverty, exploitation and oppression that is the root of the armed conflict in the country, such as genuine land reform, rural development, and national industrialization.

“ICHRP honors Ka Joma’s legacy and contributions to the struggle for self-determination and development of the Filipino people. We urge the international community and international institutions to stand with the victims of human rights violations and those who struggle for democracy and human rights in the Philippines,” concluded Peter Murphy.

ICHRP Statement for International Human Rights Day

0

Defend Human Rights!
End State Terror!
Bring Justice for the Victims!

Statement

December 10, 2022

The Philippines has its new President Marcos but remains a killing ground for
political dissidents, community organizers, indigenous people, rights
advocates, and alleged drug suspects. The machinery of terror set up by the
Duterte Regime under its “shoot-to-kill” and arbitrary arrest policies remains
firmly in place. As we mark International Human Rights Day, ICHRP
denounces the ongoing violations of political, social and economic rights and
attacks on freedom of speech and the press that continue under the Marcos
Government.

At least 10 peace consultants have been murdered by the Philippine
government since it withdrew from the peace process with the National
Democratic Front of the Philippines (NDFP) in 2017. Most recently, NDFP
peace consultant Erickson Acosta and peasant organizer Joseph Jimenez
were detained and then executed in Kabankalan City, Negros Occidental, on
November 30. The two were captured by elements of the 94th and 47th
Infantry Battalions of the Philippine Army. The military attempted to cover up
the murder by projecting Acosta as an armed combatant at the time of his
death. Locals said no firefight nor encounter had occurred. Another NDFP
peace consultant Pedro Codaste was killed on January 21, 2022, by the
Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP). This case also involved allegations of
abduction and torture by the security forces. The execution of prisoners by the
AFP represents a clear violation of International Humanitarian Law.
Negros has been the scene of ongoing state violence over the past several
months, with reports of widespread aerial bombing of civilians in early October
2022, most notably in Himamaylan City in Negros Occidental. Bombing
incidents lasting for 20 minutes were reported as well in Sitio Cunalom and
parts of Casipungan, Cambulan, Pangi and Igaw, all of Barangay Carabalan.
In the same areas residents were forced to flee their homes, with up to 2,500
persons heading for evacuation centers on October 6, after the AFP brought

in artillery and conducted indiscriminate firing on the communities.
Indiscriminate aerial bombardment and artillery strikes on communities by the
AFP represents a clear violation of International Humanitarian Law.
The media remains under attack from the Marcos government. Cyber Libel
Laws have been used in attempts to both silence and close down
independent media and have produced a litany of charges against Nobel
Peace Prize winning journalist Maria Ressa. Journalists continue to be killed
by state actors under the Marcos government, including the recent death of
on-air personality Percy Lapid, killed by unidentified gunman allegedly under
the direction of the head of the Department of Corrections. The Philippines
remains one of the most dangerous countries in the world to be a journalist.

The War on Drugs also continues under the Marcos government, despite
protestations to the contrary. The Marcos government attended the 41st
Universal Periodic Review of the Philippines at the UN Human Rights Council
in Geneva on November 14, 2022. The new government promised “real
justice in real time”, claiming they are taking concrete measures to correct the
wrongs of the Duterte government. Nothing could be further from the truth.
Despite the change of government, all the machinery and instruments of state
terror continue to function. Police anti-drug operations continue to extra-
judicially target poor people, with impunity. Recent data from the Third World
Studies Center in Manila indicates there have been 127 drug killings by
police between Marcos’ inauguration on July 1st and November 7, 2022 – the
Duterte policy rolling on. The Anti-Terrorism Act with its broad sweeping
powers and the National Task Force to End Local Communist Armed Conflict
(NTF-ELCAC), along with the Philippine National Police and the AFP,
continue to operate as mechanisms to crush dissent and to violate the civil
and political rights of citizens. No one is spared.

The Marcos government claims it is addressing the drug war killings, and
claim to have investigated 17,000 police officers and filed 15 charges in the
first six months. On the one hand, this suggests that there are 17,000 police
involved in 6,600 officially-acknowledged drug war killings. And on the other
hand, at this rate it will take the Philippine government approximately 1000
years to provide justice to the actual 30,000 odd victims of the Drug War. This
would be an example of Justice Secretary Remulla’s “real justice in real time”!
Clearly, domestic remedies have failed, as elements of the judiciary are
complicit in the war on dissent, using the bench to support military and police
attacks on dissenters by providing broad powers though warrants of arrest
that frequently ended in the summary deaths of the accused. The courts are
just one element in the entire machinery of the state which has been
weaponized in the fascist whole-of-nation approach to target regime
opponents.

In this context we urge the international community and international
institutions to stand with the victims and those who struggle for democracy
and human rights in the Philippines. We call for continued pressure through
international mechanisms and international solidarity to push the Philippine
government to action. To this end, we call for:

  1. Pressure on the UNHRC to conduct an independent investigation of
    the drug war killings and other political killings as called for in the June
    2020 report of former UN Human Rights Commissioner Michelle
    Bachelet.
  2. The Philippine government to rejoin the International Criminal Court
    (ICC) and allow it to conduct investigations in the Philippines related to
    the Crime Against Humanity of murder and violations of International
    Humanitarian Law by the Duterte government.
  3. Pressure the Philippine government to stop red tagging – executive
    designation of individuals and organizations as terrorists, such as
    NDFP Peace Negotiator Luis Jalandoni in the Netherlands, and the
    Rural Missionaries of the Philippines.
  4. The Marcos government to cease all actions that undermine the re-
    commencement of the peace talks with the NDFP.
  5. Suspension of all international aid to the Armed Forces of the
    Philippines, Philippine National Police, and counter-terrorism programs
    which would place weapons in the hands of those committing these
    grave human rights violations.
  6. National governments to introduce legislation to sanction key members
    of the Duterte government for their role in the well documented mass
    killings and the associated crimes against humanity.
  7. The Philippine Government to release all political prisoners.
    Further we urge the International Criminal Court to pursue its case against
    former President Duterte and his senior officials, to follow the evidence and
    give voice to the victims.

    Further comment: Peter Murphy, ICHRP Chairperson, +61418312301
    chairperson@ichrp.net

ICHRP Condemns the Listing of Louie Jalandoni as Terrorist by the Anti-Terrorism Council

0

Statement

December 9, 2022

The International Coalition for Human Rights in the Philippines (ICHRP) is one with the international community in condemning the listing of Louie Jalandoni, 87 years old, as “terrorist” by the Philippines’ Anti-Terrorism Council (ATC).

ICHRP supports the Committee DEFEND, a group defending the rights of Louie Jalandoni, in submitting the petition addressed to the Philippine President through the Justice Secretary Jesus Crispin C. Remulla, against the designation of Louie Jalandoni as terrorist. This submission by the Filipino people was supported by around 1,500 initial on-line signatories from the international community.

Last May 25, the Anti-Terrorism Council through its Resolution No. 31 unjustly designated Louie Jalandoni along with five other people, as terrorists without due process. This designation was based on trumped-up charges from their so-called confidential “verified information”. Jalandoni is the former chairperson of the Negotiating Panel of the National Democratic Front of the Philippines (NDFP), who has resided in the Netherlands since 1976.

“That the Anti-Terrorism Council can designate individuals or groups as terrorists without prior notice and transparency to its selection process clearly shows the Philippine government’s disregard for the right to due process of the Filipino people. It is no different from red-tagging, which arbitrarily labels as enemies of the state those who advocate for the legitimate demands of the impoverished Filipino people”, said ICHRP Chairperson Peter Murphy. “There is no judicial role in this designation, it is an arbitrary executive decision.”

Amidst the country’s worsening human rights crisis, ICHRP reiterates its calls on the Philippine Government to heed the recommendations of other member states of the United Nations in the recently concluded 41st Session of the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) last November to respect the rights of the Filipino people. Murphy also called for the international community to continue to monitor the developments of human rights under the administration of President Bongbong Marcos Jr, and to press for the Philippines to return to the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court.

Joint statement: Standing in solidarity with Filipino human rights defenders

0

Attached below is a joint statement by the 𝗪𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱 𝗢𝗿𝗴𝗮𝗻𝗶𝘇𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗔𝗴𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘀𝘁 𝗧𝗼𝗿𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 (𝗢𝗠𝗖𝗧) on the ongoing criminalization of ten human rights defenders and members of Karapatan, GABRIELA and the Rural Missionaries of the Philippines (RMP), to which the 𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗖𝗼𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗛𝘂𝗺𝗮𝗻 𝗥𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗣𝗵𝗶𝗹𝗶𝗽𝗽𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀 (𝗜𝗖𝗛𝗥𝗣) is a signatory.

——————————————————————————

We, the undersigned organisations, express our utmost concern over the ongoing criminalization of ten human rights defenders and members of Karapatan, GABRIELA and the Rural Missionaries of the Philippines (RMP) in retaliation for their legitimate human rights work.

𝗘𝗹𝗶𝘀𝗮 𝗧𝗶𝘁𝗮 𝗟𝘂𝗯𝗶, Karapatan Chairperson; 𝗖𝗿𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗮 𝗣𝗮𝗹𝗮𝗯𝗮𝘆, Karapatan Secretary General; 𝗥𝗼𝗻𝗲𝗼 𝗖𝗹𝗮𝗺𝗼𝗿, Karapatan Deputy Secretary General; 𝗚𝗮𝗯𝗿𝗶𝗲𝗹𝗮 𝗞𝗿𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗮 𝗗𝗮𝗹𝗲𝗻𝗮, Karapatan Treasurer; 𝗘𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗮 𝗕𝘂𝗿𝗴𝗼𝘀; 𝗪𝗶𝗹𝗳𝗿𝗲𝗱𝗼 𝗥𝘂𝗮𝘇𝗼𝗹, and 𝗝𝗼𝘀𝗲 𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗶 𝗖𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘂𝗲𝗻𝗴, Karapatan National Council members; 𝗚𝗲𝗿𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗱𝗲𝘀 𝗥𝗮𝗻𝗷𝗼 𝗟𝗶𝗯𝗮𝗻𝗴, Gabriela Chairperson; 𝗝𝗼𝗮𝗻 𝗠𝗮𝘆 𝗦𝗮𝗹𝘃𝗮𝗱𝗼𝗿, Gabriela Secretary General; and 𝗦𝗿. 𝗘𝗹𝗲𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗮 𝗕𝗲𝗹𝗮𝗿𝗱𝗼, RMP member, are facing trial before the Quezon City Metropolitan Trial Court Branch 37 on malicious and trumped-up charge of “perjury” in retaliation for their actions seeking legal protection for human rights defenders. The week of January 2, 2023 the verdict will be handed down. If convicted, they could face up to four months or up to more than two years of imprisonment.

On May 6, 2019, due to the alarming increase in violence against human rights defenders in the Philippines, the above-mentioned human rights defenders from Karapatan, Gabriela, and the RMP filed a petition for the writ of amparo (protection order) and habeas data (access to information) before the Supreme Court, seeking protection against threats, attacks, and harassment by government officials. However, the Philippine Court of Appeals denied their petition in June 2019.

Following the rejection of the petition, the authorities responded with retaliatory measures against the 10 human rights defenders. On July 2, 2019, then-National Security Adviser General Hermogenes Esperon, who was named in the petition, lodged a complaint alleging that the 10 defendants had committed “perjury” by stating that the RMP was a registered non-governmental organisation at the Securities and Exchange Commission in the petition they filed before the Supreme Court. While the perjury complaint was initially dismissed for “lack of probable cause and/or insufficiency of evidence”, in February 2020, the Quezon City prosecutor sustained a motion for reconsideration filed by the National Security Adviser and found probable cause to charge the 10 human rights defenders with “perjury”. The charges against the 10 human rights defenders have been widely condemned by regional and global civil society organisations as well as the UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders.

Since the “perjury” charges were filed, the Department of Justice has charged at least 16 people, including nuns, linked to the Rural Missionaries of the Philippines with financing terrorism under Section 8(ii) of Republic Act 10168 or anti-terrorism financing act.

In the Philippines, human rights defenders continue to face attacks, killings, judicial harassment, arbitrary detention and stigmatisation campaigns by State agents, proxies, supporters and enablers. Since June 2016, when President Duterte took power, a climate of impunity for attacks against human rights defenders worsened. The killings of defenders have rarely been investigated, which increases the vulnerability of those who remain active, while undermining the human rights community’s confidence in the justice system. In addition, the Anti-Terrorism Act, which was passed in July 2020, further compounded the precarious situation for human rights defenders by legally formalising the practice of “red-tagging” defenders with overly broad and vague definitions of terrorism. The grave human rights situation in the Philippines including the ongoing onslaught facing human rights defenders has resulted in expressions of grave concern from the Office of the UN High Commissioner on Human Rights (OHCHR) in June 2020 and more recently a number of Members of the European Parliament. Similarly, in April 2020, 9 UN human rights experts expressed their concern regarding the killings, threats, detentions and criminalization of human rights defenders in the Philippines. Both the OHCHR and the UN human rights experts recommended establishing an international, independent investigation of human rights violations in the Philippines.

We call on the new President of the Philippines, Ferdinand Marcos Jr., to distance himself from the previous administration, and firmly commit to respecting the right to defend human rights. President Marcos Jr. should cease the threats and attacks against rights defenders and ensure the protection of their rights, including the rights to life, due process, freedom of expression, and freedom of peaceful assembly. We urge the authorities to put an immediate end to the judicial harassment against Elisa Tita Lubi, Cristina Palabay, Roneo Clamor, Gabriela Krista Dalena, Edita Burgos, Wilfredo Ruazol, Jose Mari Callueng, Gertrudes Ranjo Libang, Joan May Salvador, and Sr. Elenita Belardo. Similarly, we call on the authorities to rescind the Anti-Terrorism Act and adopt the Human Rights Defenders Protection Bill.

We are inspired by the work, courage and commitment of these human rights defenders, and stand in solidarity with all of them.

𝗦𝗶𝗴𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿𝗶𝗲𝘀:

1. ACAT – Germany

2. Action Solidarité Tiers Monde (ASTM) – Luxembourg

3. ALTSEAN – Burma

4. Anti-Death Penalty Asia Network (ADPAN)

5. Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (FORUM-ASIA)

6. Asia Pacific Forum on Women, Law and Development (APWLD)

7. Associació Catalana per la Pau – Catalonia/Spain

8. AWID – International

9. Banglar Manabadhikar Surakhsa Mancha (MASUM) – India

10. Business and Human Rights Resource Centre (BHRRC) – International

11. Canada-Philippines Solidarity for Human Rights – Canada

12. Capital Punishment Justice Project – Australia

13. Centre for Philippine Concerns – Canada

14. Changement Social Bénin – Benin

15. Comisión Mexicana de Defensa y Promoción de los Derechos Humanos (CMDPDH) – Mexico

16. CIVICUS – International

17. Environmental Defender Law Center – United States

18. ESCR-Net – International Network for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights – International

19. Federal Association of Vietnamese Refugees in the Federal Republic of Germany

20. Filipino Women’s Organization in Quebec (PINAY) – Canada

21. Front Line Defenders – International

22. Fundación Promoción Humana – Argentina

23. Greek Helsinki Monitor – Greece

24. Human Rights Defenders Alert (HRDA) – India

25. Human Rights First – International

26. Human Rights Watch – International

27. IBON International

28. International Coalition for Human Rights in the Philippines (ICHRP) – International

29. International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH), in the framework of the Observatory for the Protection of Human Rights Defenders

30. International League of People’s Struggle – Canada

31. International Service for Human Rights (ISHR) – International

32. Judicial Reform Foundation – Taiwan

33. KAIROS Canada

34. La Voix des Sans Voix pour les Droits de l’Homme (VSV) – Democratic Republic of the Congo

35. Lawyers’ Rights Watch Canada

36. Lok Shakti Abhiyan – India

37. London Mining Network – United Kingdom

38. Malaya Movement – Canada

39. Malaya Movement – United States

40. Mesoamerican Initiative of Women Human Rights Defenders (IM-Defensoras)

41. Migrante – Canada

42. Narasha Community Development Group – Kenya

43. National Autonomous Union of Public Administration Staff (SNAPAP) – Algeria

44. National Fisheries Solidarity Movement – Sri Lanka

45. National Lawyers Guild San Francisco Bay Area Chapter – United States

46. Netherlands Philippines Solidarity Movement – Netherlands

47. Odhikar – Bangladesh

48. ONG Construisons Ensemble le Monde – Democratic Republic of the Congo

49. Project South – United States

50. Public Service Alliance of Canada – Alliance de la Fonction publique du Canada – Canada

51. Rural People’s Sangam – India

52. Samidoun Palestinian Prisoner Solidarity Network – International

53. SOHRAM-CASRA – Turkey

54. Synergie des femmes pour les victimes des violences sexuelles (SFVS) – Democratic Republic of the Congo

55. Tapol – Indonesia

56. The Open University – United Kingdom

57. The Uplands Center – United States

58. United Church of Canada – Canada

59. Universidad Nacional José Faustino Sánchez Carrión – Huacho – Peru

60. Viva Salud – Belgium

61. Women of Diverse Origins – Canada

62. Women’s Global Network for Reproductive Rights (WGNRR) – International

63. Women Human Rights Defenders International Coalition

64. World Organisation Against Torture, in the framework of the Observatory for the Protection of Human Rights Defenders

𝗜𝗻𝗱𝗶𝘃𝗶𝗱𝘂𝗮𝗹𝘀:

1. Bronwyn Dudley

2. Emile Kinley-Gauthier

3. Florfina Marcelino

ICHRP Welcomes UN Rapporteur Visit to the Philippines, Calls on Marcos Government to Allow Transparent Investigation of Extra-Judicial Killings

0

Press Release
November 27, 2022

“The International Coalition for Human Rights in the Philippines (ICHRP) welcomes the recent announcement by Philippines Justice Secretary Jesus Remulla that UN Special Rapporteur Morris Tidball-Binz, a forensic doctor, will visit the Philippines next year,” said ICHRP Chairperson Peter Murphy this Saturday. “As Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary, and arbitrary executions, Tidball-Binz’s visit would be an important next step in the process of seeking justice for the thousands of victims of extrajudicial killings under the previous Duterte government, as well as the current Marcos government.”

As reported by Investigate PH, in which Philippine forensic expert Dr. Rachel Fortun served as one of the expert witnesses, tens of thousands of extrajudicial and arbitrary killings took place under President Duterte. A majority of these took place in the government’s “war on drugs”, which mobilized police officers and vigilante groups to kill as many as 30,000 suspected drug dealers or drug users. The Philippine National Police admit to over 6,600 such killings. But despite the abundant evidence that these killings took place, only 25 police officers have been charged so far in relation to the war on drugs, according to Secretary Remulla’s report to member states of the Human Rights Council on November 14

Other targets of EJKs under Duterte’s war on dissent were human rights defenders, journalists, lawyers, Indigenous leaders, peasants, and labor leaders. Even under the new Marcos administration, these killings continue: recently radio journalist Percy Lapid was killed in a plot allegedly orchestrated by a senior government official. 

“Given this recent announcement, we reiterate our call to the Marcos administration for open, transparent, and thorough investigation of these crimes, and justice for all victims and their families,” continued Murphy. “This means investigation and prosecution of all perpetrators of such crimes, and an end to the state of impunity which has allowed so many members of the police force to avoid prosecution so far. ICHRP also echoes the call of at least ten Human Rights Council member states to the Philippine government to re-join the International Criminal Court and cooperate with the ICC’s ongoing investigation into the crime against humanity of murder during the so-called war on drugs.”

For further comment: Peter Murphy +61 418 312 301, chairperson@ichrp.net

###