Home Blog Page 241

Refusing to live in fear: Portrait of a human rights defender

0

INA ALLECO R. SILVERIO
Bulatlat.com

It has been almost three decades since the downfall of the Marcos dictatorship, but Maria Isabel Aurelia Aquino’s psychological wounds caused by her experiences during those dark days remain as fresh as if they were inflicted yesterday. In her day to day dealings, however, she is able to be sincere to her facade of cheerfulness and calm.

A human rights activist, she knows that fighting for human rights takes courage and persistence.

“But it also takes much personal strength. It’s not always easy to put up a brave face when your work is about defending other people’s rights to live in dignity and to stop physical abuse and exploitation. It can take a toll on you, the knowledge of how so many Filipinos are forced to live not knowing their rights or having their rights violated in a myriad of ways. And then when you consider your own experiences, it’s sometimes gets even harder,” she said ruefully.

Born in Manila to an upper middle class family, Ma. Isabel grew up in an old Spanish house along Severino Street near Claro M. Recto Avenue in Manila. It was an area that saw many street protests and battles between anti-Marcos activists and the Metrocom (now the Philippine National Police), and a stone’s throw away from Don Chino Roces bridge, or more popularly known as Mendiola bridge. She attended a private school nearby, and in the countdown to martial law and in the beginnings of the First Quarter Storm Movement, she became an activist leading students in the struggle against the dictatorship.

“There are those who would say that the days of dictatorship are long gone; but from the state of human rights in the Philippines these days, it is impossible to dismiss the truth that much remains to be desired by way of bringing genuine justice in the country,” she said.

Data gathered by Karapatan human rights organization for the second quarter of the year show the same growing list of human rights violations under President Benigno Aquino III’s Oplan Bayanihan (OPB), his administration’s counterinsurgency program which is deemed no different from the previous Macapagal-Arroyo regime’s Oplan Bantay Laya (OBL).

From July 2010 to June 2011, a shocking 48 activists have fallen victim to extrajudicial killings while three others have become victims of enforced disappearance.

Maria Isabel herself almost became a statistic back in March 2010.

On March 10, 2010, armed men arrived at her parents’ house in Severino street looking for her. She was able to elude them because her sister and a caretaker were able to immediately warn her and she was able to leave the house undetected through a separate, back exit. Her elderly parents were shaken and feared for her life but begged her to not raise the issue to the media.

“My family has been through much in the last years. In 2009, my brother Tomas Aquino disappeared and we strongly suspect that his disappearance was courtesy of the military. He was not an activist, but he was openly supportive of my human rights advocacy and very critical of the government,” she said.

Now Maria Isabel has found temporary sanctuary, and enough security to tell her story. From experience she knows that she has to assert herself and speak out about her own circumstances and the worsening human rights situation in the Philippines.?

“It’s never right to live in fear. Those who attack the civil, political and human rights of the Filipino people thrive on fear and persist in their attacks because of a culture of impunity. To remain silent is to play along with your own victimization,” she said.

In 1985, her husband Venerando Villacillo was abducted by a dozen armed men while he was standing with Ma. Isabel in front of her parents’ house. She was only able to get away with the help of relatives who saw the commotion and pushed and pulled against the assailants.

Venerando disappeared and has not been found since. He was alleged to be a high ranking official of the revolutionary movement in Isabela and Cagayan at the time he was abducted.

Her life has since then been a long series of hours waiting and searching for her husband and any news of him. She did not allow grief and worry to defeat her and instead used both to strengthen her own commitment to defend human rights in the country. She became a co-founder and consultant of Karapatan, Desaperacidos and other human rights organizations in the country including those based in Mindanao and Cagayan Valley.

Through the years, too, she has had constant reminders that to be an activist in the Philippines is to be a target of those who violate human rights. She has received death threats via cell phone messages; been followed by strange men; and almost became a victim of a hit and run. She has considered all these as part and parcel of a live devoted to fighting against human rights violators.

“I have had co-workers, colleagues and friends abducted, tortured and killed. I have known how it is to constantly look over my shoulder and be suspicious of people I sit next to on the bus. How I have survived through the years is through sheer luck, but also because of the constant support of fellow activists and the people we seek to always serve,” she said.

When in the cities, she wore veils and other disguises. In the provinces where her light skin easily stood out among the sun-darkened skin of the local residents she wore shirts with long sleeves. She’s had more names than she cared to remember and changed the number on her cellphone as frequently as possible.

“I am most grateful to the friends, comrades and ordinary folk in the provinces who have helped me through the years. They have kept me alive with their vigilance and their concern for my safety,” she said. But like other activists, she is also human, too.

“Sometimes things can be too much to bear. I remember my husband and my brother, and my heart bleeds as I imagine what happened to them. I fear for my own parents, my relatives and my colleagues and their safety and security. My worries for myself come last, but there are days when I am so shaken by what could happen to me that I have to struggle hard to keep from completely breaking down,”she said. Sometimes she gets intense headaches, and has attacks of extreme acid reflux.

According to the Center for Victims of Torture (CVT), psychological torture includes verbal abuse, threats against family, friends and loved ones, false accusations, forced choices, mock executions, and being forced to witness torture, mutilation and murder of others.

The CVT says that psychological torture can be more damaging and cause more severe and long-lasting damage even than the pain of physical torture. It cited a 2007 study that concluded that degrading treatment and psychological manipulation cause as much emotional suffering and long-term mental health harm as physical torture. (Torture vs Other Cruel, Inhuman, and Degrading Treatment. Basoglu et al. Archives of General Psychiatry, Volume 64, March 2007).

Ma. Isabel has also undergone a tumor operation on her knee and is less mobile. Despite this new handicap and the threats to her own safety and security, she still wants to continue her work as a human rights worker and contribute to efforts to transform society. This, however, can only be done if she is able to come to terms with the emotional stress and mental anguish she suffers at the constant knowledge that she is a target. (http://bulatlat.com)

URGENT ALERT: RMP Lit-Num school red-tagged, host community attacked by paramilitaries


The paramilitary group, Wild Dogs, attacked a Higaonon community in Esperanza, Agusan del Sur after staff of the Rural Missionaries of the Philippines (RMP) asked permission for the reopening of their Literacy and Numeracy (Lit-Num) School in the the municipality.

On June 10, 2011, Melissa Amado-Comiso, the coordinator of the Lit-Num program, accompanied by Datu Man-altuwan, Datu Mantapaos Man-atibay, Benhul Hagonoy, Negosyon Lagaolao, Carolina Namatidong and Kelly Sendatol, talked to Nida Manpatilan, the mayor of Esperanza. During their visit, Nida’s husband, Deo S. Manpatilan who is also the immediate former mayor of Esperanza, was there and accused the Lit-Num school to have taught children the ideas and songs of the Communist New Peoples Army. He further insisted that should the community want development, they should accept mining companies which could provide them with schools and other services.

Manpatilan went as far as to say that the community of Simontanan, where the Lit-Num school is to be reopened, will cause the destruction of their entire barangay. Manpatilan is the head of Wild Dogs, its members trained under the National Internal Security Program (NISP) of Gloria Arroyo’s administration, and had been using the group to force communities in Esperanza to acknowledge his Certificate of Ancestral Domain Title and recognize him as the head of the Higaonon communities in the municipality. Communities, including Sitio Simontanan, however, refused to concede their Ancestral Domains to Manpatilan as they continue to resist the entry of mining companies and logging concessions into their lands.

These communities have, for years, been targets of military operations, having been branded as supporters of the New Peoples Army.  The RMP had previously initiated a Literacy and Numeracy school to capacitate the locals in knowing and defending their rights, to enable them to participate in peace-building processes, and to protect them from being taken advantage.  However, due to the red-baiting and out of fear of being subjected to military interrogations, volunteer teachers were not able to sustain their work.  The other Lit-Num schools sponsored by the RMP throughout the region experienced similar situations – some schools even used as camps by the military during operations.  Only recently, the RMP decided to reopen its Lit-Num schools in the provinces of Agusan del Sur and Bukidnon hoping that the change of government allows space for such community-based initiatives.

However, the subsequent events in Sitio Simontanan closes these possibilities.  On June 30, at around 5 in the morning, members of the Wild Dogs, some of whom community members have identified as Laging Binsalan, Tala Mansinugdan, Edik Bat-ongan and a certain ‘Ihag’, massacred the family of Arpe Belayong otherwise known as Datu Lapugotan. Datu Lapugotan, 40 years old, and Sulte ‘Amang’ San-ogan, a 21 year old deaf-mute, were instantly killed. Two of Datu Lapugotan’s children, Michelle, 14 years old and Longlong, 6 were hit on the legs. With their mother, they ran to the nearby forest and hid there for days.

Datu Lapugotan is the younger brother of Datu Mampaagi who was similarly killed by members of Task Force Gantangan, a Lumad armed group created by the Armed Forces of the Philippines in 2008. Datu Mampaagi was among the founding members of the Higaonon community organization Linundigan, which means ‘the source of all the good traditions, laws and customs’ and which actively campaigned against extractive operations in their Ancestral Domain.

These incidents clearly show what the government means by ‘development’.  What happened was no different from the killings, massacres, tortures and harassments experienced by the Lumads in the previous administration.  We condemn the continuing repression of the Indigenous Peoples!  We condemn the attack on the community which has been trying to capacitate themselves through peace-building efforts such as reopening their Literacy and Numeracy school!

For more information, you may contact the urgent alert sources below:

RURAL MISSIONARIES OF THE PHILIPPINES
Northern Mindanao Sub-Region (RMP-NMR)
P.O. Box 41324, 9200 Iligan City, PHILIPPINES
Telefax. No: +63-223-5179
E-mail address: rmp_nmr@yahoo.com.ph or rmp.nmr@gmail.com

and

KALUMBAY Regional Lumad Organization
c/o Ethnic Groups Development Resource Center (EGDRC)

Ilocos St., Aluba Phase II, Macasandig
9000 Cagayan de Oro City, Philippines
Tel Nos: +63 (88) 310 8253
E-mail Address: kalumbay@gmail.com

Australian human rights lawyer says culture of impunity reigns too under Aquino

0

By Gerry Albert Corpuz, all voices.com

MANILA, Philippines-(UPDATE)– An Australian human rights lawyer on Sunday noted the culture of impunity under Philippine President Benigno Simeon Aquino III remains a major concern among human rights advocates in the Philippines and the entire international community.

In a press conference, Prof. Gill Boehringer, an Australian human rights lawyer, criticized “the bloody human rights violations under the Aquino government,” citing that 48 activists were already killed under his watch and that 354 political prisoners are still in jail on trumped-up charges and denied of a general amnesty.

Boehringer said that there is a prevailing culture of impunity even after the Supreme Court ordered the trial of Gen. Palparan on the Empeno-Cadapan disappearance case.

Fresh from a resounding success of the fourth international assembly of the International League of Peoples Struggle (ILPS), which was attended by more than 400 delegates from 40 countries, the ILPS, the international league of anti-imperialist activists approved a resolution demanding and end to culture of impunity, and pressed Aquino to hold accountable those who behind the gruesome killings of more than 1,000 Filipino activists during the reign of former President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo.

The ILPS also took note of the failed diplomacy of President Aquino in handling the Spratlys issue. ILPS observer Prof. Fred Engst said that “it would be a mistake to escalate the conflict because it would be to the interest of the US” on the controversial Spratlys issue in the South China Sea.

Engst, who was born and grew up in China, said that China might enter the club of developed countries soon as it builds on a strong party-state expansion of monopolistic industry, trade, finance and defense in direct challenge to the United States’ overstretched position of dominance in a multipolar world.

He said that “the decline of US will not be peaceful, as the rise of China, or the reemerging of Russia will not be peaceful either.”

Commenting on Aquino’s call for US support on the disputed Spratlys, Engst said that it “is not in China’s interest to give the US an excuse to get involved in this regional dispute.”

The ILPS likewise urged President Aquino to release all Filipino political prisoners including JASIG (Joint Agreement on Safety and Immunity Guarantee) protected peace consultants Alan Jazmines and Tirso Alcantara, and peasant leader-organizers Dario Tomada and Felicidad Caparal, both from Eastern Visayas.

GerryAlbert is based in Manila, National Capital Region, Philippines, and is Anchor for Allvoices

Statement of Solidarity

International Christian Committee on Human Rights (ICCHR) of Rome, Italy express their indignation and protest against the continuous occupation at  the Manobo villages in Surigao del Sur by the elements of 29th  IB PA leading to the evacuation of the inhabitants of the affected areas.

At least 77 families have evacuated from the mountain community of Magkahunao and Upper Janipaan in Brgy. Buhisan, San Agustin, Surigao del Sur since June 26, 2011. Of this, 26 Manobo families evacuated to Brgy. Buhisan, San Agustin while 51 families sought safety at the San Agustin Municipal Gym. There are 141 families with 553 individuals in evacuation from Brgy. Mahaba staying at the Marihatag Municipal Gym bringing the number of Surigao del Sur evacuees to 218 families of about 800 individuals.

Residents of Brgy. Mahaba evacuated because of continuing military presence in their barangay exceeding the one month request granted to the 29th IB PA troops by the barangay council of Mahaba. Military troops from the 29th IB PA set up camp in the barangay hall, health center, day care center and Sangguniang Kabataan offices in Mahaba since May 6, 2011. Evacuation escalated when a 14 year old and three other residents were fired upon by military men in separate incidents last June. Florante Rivas, an abaca farmer and one of the three fired upon by the military remains missing to date.

The 29th IB PA, led by Lt. Warren Ching, refused to leave Mahaba. In a community assembly called by the 29th IB PA at the Marihatag Gym, last June 23, Major Judith Loayon and Capt. Ramiel Fugnit reiterated that the military will not leave Mahaba and will instead build a military detachment in the barangay despite residents’ protest.

On the same day, June 23, news reports in the national daily newspapers announced that Abacus Coal Exploration and Development Corporation (ACEDC) is starting the development and production phase of its Surigao del Sur coal mining sites. These are located at the Andap Valley Complex in the municipalities of Lianga, San Agustin, Marihatag and Tago.

Classes at the Mahaba Elementary School, San Roque Primary School, Magkahunao Community School and Luknodon Community School have been disrupted because of the evacuation.
The ICCHR Rome calls for immediate withdrawal of military troops and end militarization from the said  mountain communities to enable the inhabitants to return to their villages and continue their peaceful existence without harassment and the accusations of being NPA members or supporters be withdrawn.

International Christian Committee on Human Rights (ICCHR)
Rome, Italy
2 July 2011
Contact information:
e-mail : icchr2rome@gmail.com
mobile: (+39)- 3207416569, 3291757805,3356880613, 3387786763

An interview with a torture victim by the Asian Human Rights Commission

0

AHRC-ETC-015-2011,May 23, 2011,

SPECIAL REPORT
Torture in the Philippines & the unfulfilled promise of the 1987 Constitution

OVERVIEW: The Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) is publishing from today interviews conducted with victims of torture. This series of interviews will discuss, not only about how torture victims suffers while in the custody of the security forces, but the real obstacles in pursuing legal remedies within the system of justice.

Apart from torture victims themselves, the interviews will also include the families of the victims, human rights defenders and legal practitioners, who are helping torture victims–not only in pursuing the prosecution of cases in court–but also for their treatment and rehabilitation from the trauma that they experienced.

Interview 1: “My experience frightens other farmers”

In this first interview, a torture victim who led a farmer organisation speaks about his and his colleagues’ experience of torture while in police custody. Upon his request, we are withholding his personal identity and other details for his safety. This is the unofficial translation of his interview done in Filipino:

Victim: I am 67 years old, married, and had three children and five grandchildren. I was arrested in August 30, 2007 and taken to the Camp Vicente Lim. They blindfolded and tied my hands.

For 36 hours, I was not given water to drink and food to eat. I only had food on the third day of my detention with the help of my lawyer. I was lucky because my colleagues were so quick in locating me after I was arrested.

When I was in police custody, I was tortured physically, psychologically and also threatened with death. Most of the time, they (the perpetrators) assaulted me. They hit my chest hard if I refused to answer their question; they also threaten to harm my family if I refused to confess to them the ‘truth’ that they want me to confess.

I believe that what the police and the military are doing in the way of torture is a criminal offense because they are using torture to force a person to admit to a crime that they did not commit. They usually torture activists and peasant leaders. Even in other organisations, if their colleagues are unable to respond quickly to locate their colleagues following his arrest, most of them would disappear; others, their bodies would only be found elsewhere.

In my case, had my colleagues failed to respond to quickly, I could have also been dead at this time.

Q: Could you elaborate more about how you were physically tortured?

Victim: They punched my chest hard once.

Q: What question they usually asked from you?

Victim: They were asking whether I am a communist, if I am a member of the New People’s Army (NPA). I denied all their allegations. I know that I am only a leader of a farmer’s organization.

Q: Could you tell us more about the threats on your family?

Victim: They told me they would make trouble with my family. They told me they will also arrest them. They told me many (other) things. Even on the last night of my detention, they made noise on purpose by shaking the padlock of my detention cell. I heard them saying: “we will take that elderly person and kill him (ung matandang nandiyan dukutin natin at atin ng patayin)”.

That is what they did to me. They really did it on purpose for me to hear. I had to awake my fellow detainees when I hear it. But had it happened (being taken out his cell) I would definitely make noise to draw the attention of my colleagues.

Q: How about on your first day of detention, what else did they do to you while you were blindfolded?

Victim: Many things. They told me they kill me in lieu of a farmer leader that they were not able to kill. That was what they did to me. While I was blindfolded, they shone the flashlight on purpose to my eyes. What I could see is a very bright light. That is what they did to me; again they repeatedly told me that they would kill me because they were not able to kill that leader. They said that said since I am a leader, they would also kill me.

I think it was early dawn (because I could hear a crowing chicken). When I was blindfolded, I heard a child crying. They told me, when I heard the child crying, that: “you see, you’re the father of this child”. When I heard this, and after they (supposedly told the child) that I was there, the child cried even more. I was really extremely frightened because I thought that they had already taken my whole family with them. I thought of this because at first they told me that they would also take my family. I was really extremely frightened at that time. I thought the one who was crying was my grandchild.

After I was release from their custody, I was traumatized due to this experience.

Q: Did you know whether the one crying was a boy or a girl?

Victim: I was certain it was a child. But I thought it was pre-recorded and they played it to frighten me even more.

Q: Could you tell us what trauma you have experienced?

Victim: Every time I hear a loud noise, for example battle scenes; or I see a person wearing military uniform on television, I ask someone else to turn it off. That was the fear that I had experienced. But now I think I have recovered.

Q: After you were abducted, torture, falsely prosecuted in court and after having your case dismissed, how do you feel now? How did you get on with your family members and with the farmers as well?

Victim: In terms of my family, I did not have a problem. But it is more of my own fear, my experience which also created fear amongst the farmers’ organisation (in my community) that they (some of his colleagues) were already refusing to let me enter in their homes unlike before that they were very accommodating. They were frightened that what had happened to me could also be done to them. That was the effect on me and for my work.

Q: After the incident, was your life ever normal again like what it used to be? Were you still able to do things that you usually did before you were arrested and tortured?

Victim: Not anymore! I was not able to return to our homes for over a year. I had to live in somebody else’s houses. I choose not to return home until I was finally exonerated from the false charges. In those days, I lived in fear and had to be in hiding.

Q: Could you tell us your opinion about the torture that you have experienced? About what the police and the military had done to you?

Victim: I thought it (torture) was a doing of criminals. Firstly, because they forced me to admit to an offense I did not really commit. They hurt you to force you to admit whatever allegations they would have on you.

Q: Now that we already have a law against Torture, what is your opinion on this?

Victim: I think it would be better if the law would be strictly implemented. But if the law is not be implemented it is also meaningless. I think there should be an effective implementation of the law, if there is really such a law.

Q: What do you mean about how to implement the law?

Victim: I mean the government must implement it because it is also the government (and those who are in the government) who violate this law.

Q: If you would be given a choice, had the torture on you happened when the law took effect, would you be willing to file a case in court?

Victim: Perhaps not anymore.

Q: Why?

A: In my experience, of course you can file a case in court if there are violations, but until I can see that something really happens to these cases in court, it would not be able to convince myself to pursue my case. I must see that someone could be punished first. I’m not sure if you have seen on television about the torture video case of (Darius Evangelista). Were the policemen involved punished?

Q: Do you have any further message to victims of torture like you, to the Philippine government after the Anti-Torture Act have been enacted?

Victim: To my colleagues, that they should continue their work with caution. They should show to others that there is nothing wrong in what they do; and that what the police do in illegally arresting person is wrong. They (the police) have no proof that those persons whom they are arresting had committed wrongdoings, but they still continue to arrest them. And those in the government, they should implement the law in real sense and they should not punish persons that they are not sure had committed wrong doing.

Q: How about a message to victims of torture?

Victim: This is just a test on them as (human rights and political activists) leaders. We have already expected this to happen to us and it does happen. As long as those in the government do not serve us in real sense, this will continue to happen. We should continue to take precautions always.

—————-
The views shared in this article do not necessarily reflect those of the AHRC, and the AHRC takes no responsibility for them.

# # #

About AHRC: The Asian Human Rights Commission is a regional non-governmental organisation that monitors human rights in Asia, documents violations and advocates for justice and institutional reform to ensure the protection and promotion of these rights. The Hong Kong-based group was founded in 1984.

Visit our new website with more features at www.humanrights.asia.
—————————–

Asian Human Rights Commission
#701A Westley Square,
48 Hoi Yuen Road, Kwun Tong, Kowloon,
Hongkong S.A.R.
Tel: +(852) – 2698-6339
Fax: +(852) – 2698-6367

URL: humanrights.asia
twitter/youtube/facebook: humanrightsasia